US Retaliation to Deepseek: A Zero-Sum Game
deepseek
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
US responds to Deepseek with zero sum thinking, implying growth comes at others' expense.
Zero-sum thinking has been identified as a key factor in America's response to Deepseek, a concept that suggests gains for one individual or group come at the expense of others. This mindset has been explored in recent research, including a survey of 20,400 US residents, which measured zero-sum thinking, political preferences, and policy views. The rise of zero-sum thinking is believed to have contributed to the starkly different responses to the Sputnik and DeepSeek moments, with the latter sparking retrenchment rather than investment.
The implications of zero-sum thinking are significant, as it can lead to a belief that growth for one group must come at the expense of another. This mindset can have far-reaching consequences, influencing political preferences, policy views, and ultimately, the country's response to technological advancements like Deepseek. As researchers continue to study the origins and implications of zero-sum thinking, it is essential to consider its impact on the nation's ability to adapt to emerging technologies.
As the conversation around zero-sum thinking and its effects on America's response to Deepseek continues, it will be important to watch how policymakers and industry leaders address this mindset. Will efforts be made to shift the narrative and promote a more collaborative approach to growth and development, or will zero-sum thinking continue to dominate the discourse? The answer to this question will have significant implications for the country's ability to harness the potential of technologies like Deepseek and drive innovation forward.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN