Censure a symbolic sham many dirty hands skim Sam's scam #openai #aifraud RE: https://bsky
openai
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
A wave of online condemnation has erupted around OpenAI chief Sam Altman after a New Yorker investigation published in December 2025 exposed internal memos suggesting the company considered auctioning advanced models to governments and that Altman had pursued “hundreds of billions of dollars” from foreign sources. The expose, built on more than a hundred interviews, reignited scrutiny of Altman’s business practices and prompted a terse post on Bluesky that called the censure “a symbolic sham” and accused “many dirty hands” of skimming Altman’s “scam”.
The Bluesky message, amplified by the hashtags #openai and #aifraud, coincided with two legal fronts that have already placed Altman under pressure. Earlier this week he filed a motion to dismiss punitive‑damage claims in a lawsuit filed by his sister, alleging sexual abuse; Altman seeks only a symbolic $1 in damages, arguing he does not intend financial harm but wants a court declaration that the accusations are false. At the same time, a separate case brought by Elon Musk is set for trial on April 27, accusing OpenAI of deviating from its original mission and misleading Musk’s early investment.
The backlash matters because it ties together reputational, legal and geopolitical concerns that could reshape OpenAI’s standing with investors, regulators and foreign governments. If courts reject Altman’s symbolic‑damage strategy, the company could face substantial financial exposure, while a Musk verdict unfavorable to OpenAI would fuel calls for tighter oversight of AI firms that receive public‑sector contracts—a theme we highlighted on April 17 when reporting on Google’s negotiations with the Pentagon over custom AI chips.
Watch for the outcome of the Musk trial, the court’s ruling on the sister‑suit, and any formal response from OpenAI’s board. A decisive judgment could trigger shareholder actions, prompt new compliance measures, or accelerate legislative proposals aimed at curbing opaque AI‑technology deals.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN