AI 週報：2026/4/1–4/10 Anthropic 三震續集——Mythos 太危險不敢放、營收超車 OpenAI、軟體股應聲重挫
anthropic gemma google meta openai
| Source: Dev.to | Original article
Anthropic’s much‑talked‑about Mythos model finally emerged from the shadows on April 7, but the company announced it would not ship the system after internal audits uncovered thousands of zero‑day vulnerabilities. The findings, released through the Project Glasswing safety framework, marked a stark reversal from the preview Anthropic rolled out last week. By pulling the plug, Anthropic underscored the growing chasm between rapid model scaling and the ability to secure those systems, a theme that has haunted the industry since the “Claude Mythos” breakthrough we covered on April 10.
The decision came as Anthropic reported a surge to $30 billion in quarterly revenue, overtaking OpenAI for the first time. The windfall was driven by a wave of enterprise contracts that bundled Mythos‑grade safety tools with the firm’s Claude‑4 suite, even though the flagship model itself remains offline. The market reaction was swift: software‑sector indices slumped 2.6 % in a single session, reflecting investor anxiety that safety setbacks could stall broader AI adoption.
At the same time, OpenAI closed a historic $122 billion private‑equity round, bolstering its war chest for compute and talent. Meta, under Wang Hui‑wen, launched Muse Spark, its inaugural closed‑source model, signaling a shift toward proprietary offerings that sidestep the open‑model scrutiny that plagued Anthropic. Google unveiled Gemma 4, a 310‑billion‑parameter model that outperforms rivals that are twenty times larger, while Elon Musk and Intel announced a joint “Terafab” chip fab aimed at delivering next‑generation AI silicon.
What to watch next: whether Anthropic can patch Mythos and resume a commercial rollout, how regulators will respond to a model deemed “too dangerous to ship,” and whether the influx of capital into OpenAI and the hardware push from Musk‑Intel will reshape the competitive hierarchy. The next quarter will reveal if safety concerns can be reconciled with the relentless race for scale.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN