AI Linked to Emerging New Fascism
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
The piece argues AI’s tie to ultra‑right ideology is building a digital infrastructure that could enable 21st‑century fascism, contradicting tech leaders’ saviour narrative.
A new book titled **AI and the New Fascism** is set to hit shelves in November 2026, offering a stark diagnosis of how the tech sector’s “salvation myths” intersect with ultra‑right ideology to forge a digital infrastructure that could underpin 21st‑century authoritarianism. Published by Pluto Press and translated into English by Ali Jones, the 208‑page volume argues that the disruption ethos of Silicon Valley, championed by figures such as Sam Altman and Elon Musk, masks a deeper alignment with far‑right aspirations for algorithmic control.
The work builds on a growing body of analysis that links big‑tech governance of AI to technofascist tendencies. Earlier pieces such as the January 2026 “Technofascism: AI, Big Tech, and the new authoritarianism” report highlighted how corporate control over AI pipelines can amplify illiberal politics, while the February 2025 “AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism” essay documented the weaponisation of AI‑generated imagery by extremist groups. By weaving these strands together, the new book claims the convergence of AI and far‑right populism is no longer a speculative threat but a concrete digital architecture that erodes democratic friction.
The publication matters because it reframes the AI debate beyond technical safety and bias, positioning the technology as a potential tool for coordinated authoritarian surveillance and propaganda. For policymakers in the Nordics and across Europe, the analysis underscores the urgency of scrutinising AI supply chains, data‑governance frameworks, and the political economy of platform power.
What to watch next includes the book’s reception among scholars, civil‑society groups and regulators, as well as any legislative initiatives that reference its findings. Follow‑up discussions in parliamentary committees, EU AI‑risk assessments and Nordic digital‑rights forums are likely to cite the work as a catalyst for tighter oversight of AI deployments that could otherwise enable new forms of digital fascism.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN