Alex Bores' Who Decides aims to make AI safety a core Democratic stance by 2028 amid tech‑backed rivals' influence battle
ai-safety
| Source: Techmeme | Original article
Alex Bores' group Who Decides aims to embed AI safety as a core Democratic stance by 2028, amid competition from tech‑funded rivals.
Alex Bores, a former New York Assembly member, and policy strategist Anna Myers have launched “Who Decides,” a $30 million political effort aimed at cementing AI safety as a core Democratic platform by the 2028 presidential primary. The initiative, described as a PAC, will marshal labor unions, parents, educators, civil‑rights groups and other trusted organisations around a unified safety agenda, positioning the issue as a litmus‑test comparable to the pro‑choice stance.
The move arrives in a narrow window between the recent midterm elections and the start of the next campaign cycle, as a cluster of tech‑funded, accelerationist super‑PACs prepare to push a more permissive AI narrative. Bores, who helped shepherd New York’s RAISE Act through the state legislature, is banking on his experience in coalition‑building to counter those rivals and keep safety concerns front‑and‑center for Democratic contenders.
Why it matters is twofold. First, framing AI safety as a standard Democratic position could shape policy proposals, funding priorities and regulatory frameworks that will govern the next generation of generative models. Second, the $30 million war chest signals a willingness to match the financial firepower of industry‑backed groups, potentially turning a technical debate into a decisive electoral issue.
Observers will watch how “Who Decides” translates its funding into grassroots mobilisation and whether it can secure endorsements from high‑profile candidates ahead of the 2028 primaries. Equally important will be the response from the tech‑funded super‑PACs: will they double down on deregulation, or seek a compromise that dilutes the safety narrative? The coming months should reveal whether AI safety becomes a defining wedge for the Democratic Party or remains a peripheral policy concern.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN