AI executive says they may have committed the largest labor theft in history
copyright microsoft openai
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
An AI executive claims the company's practices amount to the biggest theft of labor in human history.
A legal brief unsealed this week shows a Microsoft executive describing the data‑mining that fuels large‑language models as “the largest theft of labor in human history.” The comment, made by Brent Hecht, who leads applied science at Microsoft, appears in internal emails exchanged with OpenAI and was filed as part of a copyright lawsuit brought by the New York Times. The documents reveal that senior technologists were aware of the ethical and commercial risks of scraping publicly available text, yet continued to rely on the practice to train models such as ChatGPT.
The revelation matters because it puts a stark, insider label on a practice that has long been contested by publishers, artists and labor advocates. By treating the output of countless writers, journalists and other creators as free training material, AI firms sidestep traditional compensation mechanisms, effectively appropriating the “labor” of those whose work underpins the models. The New York Times’ lawsuit argues that this constitutes copyright infringement, and the newly disclosed remarks give the plaintiffs concrete evidence that the companies understood the stakes yet proceeded anyway.
The case is now moving through the federal courts, and the unsealed filings are likely to shape the next round of litigation over AI training data. Observers will watch for any settlement offers, potential injunctions on further data scraping, and regulatory responses in the EU and the United States. Industry players may also be forced to rethink data‑licensing strategies or develop more transparent provenance tools. How courts balance intellectual‑property rights with the rapid development of generative AI could set a precedent that reverberates across the entire tech sector.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN