Leaders of AI firms warn UN Security Council it could endanger humanity
anthropic openai
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
AI company CEOs addressed the UN Security Council, warning that unchecked artificial intelligence could threaten humanity and urging global controls.
The CEOs of several leading artificial‑intelligence companies appeared before the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, urging the body to impose controls on the technology they are developing. The appeal, made during a session convened by France as part of the 81st UN General Assembly, highlighted the growing risk that increasingly capable AI systems could “imperil humanity” if left unchecked.
OpenAI’s chief executive and the head of Anthropic were among the speakers, arguing that without coordinated safeguards the rapid evolution of AI could outpace human oversight. Their plea was framed as a request for the UN to act “for the sake of humanity,” reflecting a broader concern that autonomous systems may soon be able to improve themselves and slip beyond direct control.
The intervention matters because it signals a rare moment of self‑regulation from the industry’s most influential players. By calling on an intergovernmental forum, the firms are acknowledging that market‑based safeguards alone may be insufficient and that a global governance framework could be needed to prevent existential threats. The appeal also underscores the tension between innovation and regulation, a theme that has surfaced repeatedly in recent weeks as governments and corporations grapple with the societal impact of AI.
What follows will be closely watched. The Security Council is expected to deliberate on possible resolutions, and member states may begin drafting international standards or treaties. Parallel national efforts, such as the EU’s AI Act and emerging U.S. legislative proposals, could converge with any UN outcome, shaping the regulatory landscape for the next generation of AI. The next UN session and any formal commitments from member states will indicate whether the industry’s warning translates into concrete global policy.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN