I want to see human creativity not machine plagiarism # GenAI # LLM # AI
| Source: Mastodon | Original article
A coalition of visual artists, writers and musicians announced on Tuesday that they will lobby European regulators to draw a clear legal line between human‑originated works and content produced by large language models (LLMs) or generative‑AI tools. The group, spearheaded by Swedish digital‑artist Ali Abbas, released a manifesto titled “Human Creativity, Not Machine Plagiarism,” demanding that any work generated by AI be labelled as such and that copyright law be amended to prevent unauthorised reuse of AI‑derived material.
The call comes as generative‑AI platforms such as GPT‑4, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion flood the market with images, text and music that can be indistinguishable from human output. Abbas, who recently secured a publishing contract after a dozen rejections, argues that the current “black‑box” nature of these models enables what he calls “machine plagiarism” – the uncredited recycling of billions of copyrighted pieces into new creations. “When a model stitches together fragments of existing art without attribution, it erodes the value of the original creator’s labour,” he wrote in the manifesto.
Industry analysts say the demand could reshape how content platforms handle AI‑generated material. Jon Peddie Research’s latest report notes that while audiences are increasingly comfortable with machine‑crafted ads, they still prefer to know when a piece is human‑made. A clear labeling regime could preserve that trust and give creators a legal foothold to claim compensation when their style is mimicked at scale.
Watch for a formal petition to the European Commission expected in the coming weeks, and for reactions from major AI providers, who have so far resisted mandatory disclosure. The debate is likely to spill into Nordic copyright courts, where precedent‑setting rulings could set the tone for global policy on AI‑assisted creativity.
Sources
Back to AIPULSEN